📞 (586) 221-0937

Governing Blueprint

Strategic Policy Action Plan for Michigan

📢 Share This Page

Help spread the word about Ralph Rebandt's vision for Michigan's future

Share Share Share Share

Overview

This document outlines campaign policy positions and an operational governing blueprint designed for legislative enactment and administrative implementation. The reforms are aimed at restoring checks and balances between the legislative and executive branches, drastically increasing transparency across state government, strengthening oversight of agencies and regulated monopolies, ensuring election integrity, and managing a power transition back to local government.

The document is organized by policy area. Each section states the policy objective, provides background, and lays out specific implementation mechanisms — including statutory changes, administrative actions, oversight responsibilities, and funding considerations — for immediate legislative drafting and executive transition work.

I. Administrative Procedures Act, MOAHR & JCAR

Policy Objective

Restore effective legislative oversight of executive policymaking, codify the role and responsibilities of the Michigan Office of Administrative Hearings and Rules (MOAHR), and strengthen the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules (JCAR) so that administrative rules — particularly those affecting elections and regulatory rights — cannot be enacted without appropriate legislative review and real checks and balances in place.

Background and Structural Context

The Michigan Administrative Procedures Act (APA) governs how executive branch agencies promulgate rules. The creation of MOAHR is not based in any Michigan law — it is ceremonial and has zero authority. JCAR's enforcement authority was greatly diminished more than 25 years ago, and the legislature gutted its own committee and turned its power over to the executive branch. The result is that the executive branch, including the Secretary of State's office, can create, disseminate, and enforce election laws at will. The system has run amuck.

Successive administrations have perpetuated this loophole in Michigan governance. Both Republicans and Democrats who served in critical leadership roles share responsibility for failing to fix this.

Deficiency Analysis

The Secretary of State made three important rule changes that directly conflict with state and federal law, bypassing the legislature with no transparency and no real oversight. These three violations were established through JCAR — because JCAR has no teeth.

  1. Rule Set 2025-14: Mandates the destruction of all electronic poll book data 7 days after certification. Current federal law for all states is 22 months. Rule Set 2025-14 sets very strict limits on public access to metadata, hinders citizen access to basic election information, makes Freedom of Information requests obsolete, makes it impossible to validate state and local data, and risks severe penalties to clerks for willful destruction of election information.
  2. Rule Set 2025-13: Creates unauthorized barriers to voter registration challenges currently protected under Michigan law (MCL 168.509 and MCL 168.512). This new rule establishes a "Personal Knowledge" and "Notarization" standard that has no basis in any Michigan law.
  3. Rule Set 2025-15: Directs the use of government-provided materials for all mandatory poll challenger training. This raises serious First Amendment compelled-speech concerns. Notice requirements for these changes were not followed.

These changes appear to directly violate federal and state election laws. What Lansing needs is a Governor willing to restore a true balance of power between the executive and legislative branches.

Implementation

  1. Remove MOAHR. Draft an amendment to the APA and specify penalties for noncompliance by agencies.
  2. JCAR Authority Restoration: Drastically increase the authority of JCAR. Amend statutes to restore JCAR's power to suspend or block administrative rules that exceed statutory authority, with expedited procedures for election-related rules. Provide JCAR with subpoena authority and firm timelines for review.
  3. Rulemaking Process Reforms: Require agencies to publish regulatory impact statements for major rules, extend public comment periods for rules affecting elections or regulated monopolies, and prohibit emergency or expedited rulemaking on election administration within defined pre-election periods unless JCAR approves.
  4. Transitional Guidance and Compliance: The Governor's Office will issue executive guidance mandating agencies pause implementation of any administrative rule that alters election procedures until JCAR review is complete and the Auditor General has certified compliance with statutory obligations.

II. Election Integrity, Voter Verification & Records Retention

Policy Objective

Ensure that only eligible U.S. citizens vote in Michigan elections, strengthen verification mechanisms, preserve election records for auditability and FOIA access consistent with federal standards, and create enforceable oversight to prevent administrative shortcuts that weaken election integrity. Michigan's election process has been severely compromised over the past 35 years — at times intentionally and at times out of political ignorance.

Background and Structural Context

It is easy for any new resident in Michigan to get a driver's license and register to vote. The system to maintain, oversee, and enforce election laws in Michigan is extremely lax. Administrative rule changes have reduced transparency and impeded verification — most critically, rules mandating destruction of electronic poll book data and rules creating higher barriers to voter registration challenges. The Secretary of State's office enacted significant rules that conflict with state and federal law, and JCAR lacked the power to prevent those changes.

Policy Components

  1. Proof of Citizenship: Require presentation of a birth certificate, passport, or picture ID demonstrating U.S. citizenship to vote in Michigan elections. Support a different-color driver's license for non-citizens.
  2. In-Person Registration: Require in-person voter registration to ensure citizenship documents are presented. With 9 days of early voting now legal, this is not a hindrance.
  3. Voter Roll Maintenance: Mandate that Michigan review voter rolls beginning at the end of each election cycle to identify and remove non-citizens from the voter rolls. Remove Michigan from ERIC.
  4. Criminal Penalties: Establish stronger criminal penalties for election officials who register applicants without requiring valid proof of citizenship.
  5. Auditor General Oversight: Require the Auditor General's office to provide oversight of the Secretary of State's voter roll review.
  6. Records Retention: Require preservation of electronic poll book data and relevant election metadata for a federally-aligned 22-month retention period to enable audits, investigations, and FOIA access.
  7. Absentee Voting Oversight: Review and implement checks-and-balances procedures in the absentee voting process.
  8. Adequate Funding: Provide adequate funding to ensure proper oversight of all election integrity mechanisms.
  9. Chain of Custody: Ensure chain of custody is followed at every step. Establish penalties for failure to follow.

Broad Consensus Items

There is broad agreement on the following baseline election integrity measures:

  • Clean up the voter rolls. Remove Michigan from ERIC.
  • Require a photo ID to register and vote.
  • Watermarked paper ballots.
  • Hand-count ballots, with results posted the same day.
  • No funding of elections by outside organizations.
  • Mail-out ballots only to those who request them.
  • Secure chain of custody in ballot transfer.

Implementation Mechanisms

  1. Statutory Revision: Draft statutory language revising voter registration rules to specify acceptable forms of citizenship verification, define procedures for in-person registration, and codify retention periods for election records.
  2. Administrative Support: Fund county clerks and the Secretary of State's office to implement verification processes, including secure storage and transfer of documentation, staff training, and IT upgrades for secure poll book retention.
  3. JCAR Rule Repeal: Direct JCAR to review and rescind Rule Sets 2025-13, 2025-14, and 2025-15, and require agencies to undergo full JCAR review before adopting any new election-related rules.

III. Freedom of Information Act Expansion & Transparency Enforcement

Policy Objective

Extend FOIA coverage to the Governor's office and the Legislature. This should have been accomplished 30 years ago. Close avenues for conducting public business through private accounts without disclosure, cap fees, tighten redaction standards, and increase penalties to ensure meaningful public access to government records.

Background and Structural Context

Significant public business increasingly occurs through personal or private channels, creating a critical transparency gap. Many public officials are using personal email addresses to conduct government business. Excessive fees and broad redactions are being used to frustrate access — local governments, especially schools, have been charging outrageous amounts to fulfill a FOIA request. Complete pages, if not numerous pages in a row, are being blacked out. Existing penalties are insufficient to deter noncompliance.

Two recurring barriers to FOIA: extensive wait times, and excessive fees.

Policy Components

  1. FOIA Inclusion: Amend Michigan FOIA statutes to explicitly cover the Governor's office and the Legislature, and require disclosure of communications used to conduct public business regardless of the device or account used — including personal email addresses and personal cell phones.
  2. Private Account Capture: Mandate that communications on private email accounts or personal devices that pertain to public business be retained, indexed, and produced in response to lawful FOIA requests.
  3. Fee Caps and Redaction Standards: Establish a per-page ceiling that government agencies can charge. Tighten redaction standards — limit permissible redactions to narrowly tailored categories. Require itemized fee estimates for large requests.
  4. Enhanced Penalties: Increase fines and punishments for avoiding, violating, or not fully cooperating with a FOIA request. Establish expedited enforcement pathways to adjudicate disputes.

Implementation Mechanisms

  1. Statutory Amendment: Draft FOIA amendments to expand covered entities, define "public business" for disclosure purposes, set fee caps, and codify redaction standards.
  2. Administrative Infrastructure: Require each covered office to implement records retention and archiving systems capable of capturing private-account communications and producing responsive records.
  3. Enforcement: Grant the Attorney General and Auditor General enhanced investigatory tools and civil enforcement authority to pursue FOIA violations.

IV. Prohibition of Non-Disclosure Agreements (NDAs) in Government

Policy Objective

Strongly oppose the use of NDAs in government. They violate every aspect of transparency in government. NDAs must be prohibited in public projects and in all contexts where public business is at issue. Support the recall of any elected officials who sign an NDA, and the termination of any bureaucrats who sign an NDA.

Background and Structural Context

NDAs in government projects are antithetical to "we the people" accountability. The Stargate data center project in Saline Township is a direct example of abuse through confidentiality clauses that limited public scrutiny of subsidies, contracts, and public impacts. Direct political interference made that process deeply flawed.

Policy Components

  1. Broad NDA Ban: Make NDAs unenforceable in contexts involving public projects, public funds, or government contracts. Prohibit elected officials and public employees from entering into NDAs that conceal public decision-making.
  2. Remedies: Create removal or recall provisions and disciplinary paths for elected officials and public employees who violate the NDA prohibition. Require contracts containing prohibited NDA clauses to be voidable and subject to penalty.

Implementation Mechanisms

  1. Statutory Prohibition: Enact statutory language explicitly declaring NDAs unenforceable in public contexts. Require procurement review to identify and eliminate confidentiality clauses. Disallow state incentives for contractors that insist on NDAs.
  2. Enforcement and Whistleblower Protections: Empower the Auditor General and Attorney General to investigate NDA misuse, enable citizen complaints, and protect whistleblowers who report NDA violations.

V. Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC) & Energy Policy

Policy Objective

Restructure the governance and oversight of the MPSC to increase legislative input and transparency, protect taxpayers from unjustified rate increases, and ensure reliable service. Michigan now has one of the highest energy costs in the nation and one of the worst records on outages and restoration times. The opponents of the 2008 monopoly legislation were correct. The legislature created this situation, and it falls on the legislature to fix it.

Background and Structural Context

In August 2008 the Michigan legislature passed legislation that gave Consumers Energy and DTE a 90% guaranteed share of the Michigan power market — a monopoly. The power companies argued this would create a secure market allowing them to invest heavily in the power grid, reducing costs and reducing the number and length of power outages. Opponents argued a monopoly would eliminate competition, limit innovation, and remove any incentive to control costs. Outcomes since then have validated the opposing view.

During the 16 years of energy policy that followed, no effort was made to examine the oversight of the MPSC. The power companies currently spend millions on lobbying activities. In the 2018 primary they spent over $350,000 to defeat a single candidate. As regulated monopolies, total transparency has become critically necessary.

Phase One — Immediate Energy Policy Actions

  • Repeal all green-energy mandates.
  • Restore all zoning decisions to local elected officials.
  • Eliminate the Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy role in green-energy implementation.
  • Eliminate the Department of Labor and Economic Development role in green-energy implementation.
  • Direct the power companies to release their green-energy plans immediately — they were due into the MPSC in December 2025.
  • Eliminate all "environmental justice" mandates in the green-energy laws.
  • Expand energy choice.
  • Simplify rules to allow customers to sell energy back to the grid.
  • Remove all greenhouse gas language from state statutes consistent with the federal repeal of 2009 greenhouse mandates.
  • Eliminate all electric-vehicle subsidies, tax incentives, and boilerplate language encouraging EV use from the budget.

MPSC Structural Changes

  • Governor nominates energy experts to the MPSC board.
  • Expand energy choice in Michigan.
  • Require the full Michigan Senate to approve or reject all voting members within 120 days — as a record roll-call vote before the entire Senate.
  • Change term lengths from six to four years; no member shall serve more than two four-year terms.
  • Michigan Attorney General retains oversight responsibility.
  • If a rate-increase request exceeds 5% or the rate of inflation, JCAR shall approve the rate hike.
  • Empower JCAR with the needed authority to investigate and approve rate increases.
  • Empower the Auditor General to serve as the research and investigation agency for JCAR — the Auditor General reports to the legislature only.
  • Implement new restrictions on what expenses the power companies may include to justify a rate hike.
  • Request JCAR to develop an Ethics Form to be used by the Senate to vet nominees to the MPSC.
  • Develop a conflict-of-interest policy with real teeth.
  • Develop new transparency laws for the political contributions the power companies make — they are regulated monopolies.

VI. Data Centers & Economic Development Transparency

Policy Objective

Ralph Rebandt is a strong supporter of safe economic development efforts driven by the free market. The process used for the Stargate data center in Saline Township, however, was deeply flawed due to direct political interference. A one-year pause must be put in place on major data center approvals until proper transparency and oversight frameworks are established. A major concern is the ability of DTE or Consumers to provide reliable power to all customers — Michigan may already be experiencing power shortages without the added burden of large data centers.

Policy Components

  1. NDA Ban: A state ban on Non-Disclosure Agreements must be put in place, including for elected officials and all bureaucrats involved in the projects (see Section IV).
  2. Environmental Study and Public Vetting: All environmental studies must be fully completed by relevant federal and state agencies and publicly vetted for a minimum of 90 days before incentives or approvals are granted.
  3. Full Disclosure: Full, transparent disclosure of all government subsidies, tax credits, and zoning concessions. Full, transparent disclosure of energy contracts involving DTE or Consumers and their relationship with the data center. As regulated monopolies, transparency is not asking too much. The DTE contract with the Saline data center is heavily redacted.
  4. Open Meetings and Records: All local government meetings — zoning boards of appeals, planning commissions, city councils, or township board meetings — must be open to the public.

Specific Implementation

  1. One-year pause on major data center approvals.
  2. Public meetings and transparency required at every stage.
  3. No NDAs may be signed for a data center project.
  4. Meeting minutes must be available to the public. Nothing can be redacted.

VII. Property Tax Elimination Transition & Local Government Reform

Policy Objective

Ralph Rebandt has publicly supported attempts to eliminate property taxes in Michigan — often referred to as AxMiTax. A more comprehensive approach is needed. Seriously limit the size and scope of government. The government must focus on its core responsibilities. Voters support ending property taxes, but are concerned about the speed.

Core Government Priorities

The government has no business owning and operating golf courses, parks, zoos, museums, cemeteries, splash pads, or pickleball courts. Core priorities must be:

  1. Public Safety
  2. Secure Elections
  3. K-12 Education
  4. Infrastructure
  5. Care for veterans and first responders injured in the line of duty

Phased Implementation Plan

Step One — Prioritize Core Functions of Government. Actually prioritize the core functions of government listed above and eliminate functions that fall outside them. Separate needs from wants.

Step Two — Stop Unfunded Mandates. The state issued all new regulations in January 2025 for fire departments — new maintenance requirements, replacement-time schedules for all equipment, new training and promotion requirements, and specific equipment storage mandates. Fire chiefs have said these new demands will increase their budget by 75% to 100%. There are 19 state departments placing this type of burden on local governments constantly. City administrators have said they could use a full-time employee just to keep up with the demands. This must stop.

Step Three — Restore Authority to JCAR. Restore authority to the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules. This committee was created specifically to be a stop on a runaway executive branch — which is exactly what Michigan now has. The legislature gutted its own committee and turned its power over to the executive branch. That was a serious mistake.

Step Four — Amend the Urban Cooperation Act. The Urban Cooperation Act, first passed in 1967 and last amended in 2012, was created specifically to encourage local governments to combine services. Functions such as fire, zoning, parks, 911, sewer, and water can and have been combined. This approach saves taxpayer dollars and improves services for residents.

Step Five — State Partnership and Incentives. Local governments have a poor history of combining services — egos, history, and rivalries often get in the way of real progress. The state needs to become a partner in this initiative and help incentivize these efforts, utilizing organizations like the Michigan Township Association, Michigan Municipal League, and the Michigan State Cooperative Extension Service.

Step Six — Remove Property Tax Through Business Growth. Pair these reforms with sustained business-friendly policy so that economic growth replaces property tax revenue over time, allowing the elimination of the property tax without sacrificing essential services.

VIII. Part-Time Legislature & Institutional Guardrails

Policy Objective

Ralph Rebandt has publicly supported a part-time legislature for decades. Guardrails must be put in place to control a possible runaway executive branch. There is, in effect, a fourth branch of government — the unelected bureaucrats. The guardrails listed below address that.

Required Guardrails

  • Outlaw all Non-Disclosure Agreements.
  • Increase the role, responsibility, and authority of the Auditor General's office.
  • Drastically increase the authority of the Joint Committee on Administrative Rules.
  • Make the Governor and Legislature subject to FOIA.
  • Increase accountability and transparency on year-end carryover dollars.
  • Reduce the size of state government and return responsibility, authority, and accountability to local units of government.
  • Make any and all executive agreements and contracts subject to FOIA.
  • Place further limits on the executive branch's ability to transfer money between line items.
  • Provide additional pay for legislators attending meetings in their districts.
  • A part-time legislature will stop the professional political ladder-climber.

IX. Education Governance & Cell Phone Policy

Policy Objective

Ralph Rebandt strongly favors a local-control approach to this issue. Michigan school board members currently have the responsibility and authority to approve budgets, curriculum, and staffing issues within the district — they could also approve a cell phone policy. The Okemos school district just passed one. That is exactly how local control is supposed to work.

Policy Components

A statewide cell phone bill was a mistake. The right approach is to encourage local school districts to step up and solve their problem in a way that involves local voters. Setting up a study group of parents, teachers, school administrators, and a school board member is straightforward — they can hold open public meetings, gather input, and develop a policy for the entire school board to review. That is how a democratic republic works.

Ralph Rebandt supports a ban on cell phones during class time. This should never have been an issue if school teachers and administrators were actively involved in providing a comprehensive educational approach. State guidance and model policy templates will be made available to districts that want them.

X. Immigration Administrative Integrity & Public System Protections

Policy Objective

Protect the integrity of public benefit systems and voter rolls by strengthening verification protocols for benefit eligibility and driver's license issuance, and restoring appropriate cooperation with federal immigration authorities.

Background and Structural Context

According to USAFacts, Michigan officially has just under 800,000 immigrants. The actual number is unknown. Border-state enforcement was lax during the prior federal administration, and the State Police were quietly told not to cooperate with ICE. It is easy for any new resident in Michigan to get a driver's license and register to vote — applying for benefits at any Department of Health and Human Services office produces an application for both.

Policy Components

  1. Verification Procedures: Strengthen verification protocols for public benefits and driver's license issuance to prevent misuse of application processes as de facto voter registration or benefit access without proper documentation.
  2. Federal Cooperation: Restore appropriate cooperation protocols between state law enforcement, the Department of Health and Human Services, and federal immigration authorities. The State Police will no longer be directed to avoid cooperation with ICE.
  3. End Sanctuary City Status: End sanctuary city status statewide; encourage and support state and federal immigration operations to arrest and deport individuals in violation of immigration law.

XI. Drug Policy — Recreational Marijuana

Policy Objective

Ralph Rebandt strongly opposes recreational marijuana. Scientific studies show marijuana most often acts as a gateway drug leading to the use of more powerful, addictive drugs. Numerous scientific studies have concluded that marijuana has a harmful effect on brain development for teens and young adults.

Ralph Rebandt opposes the 24% wholesale tax on marijuana. The intention is to shrink the government via executive orders and to reduce regulations and taxes on all businesses. Government spending must be reined in.

XII. Infrastructure, MDOT Oversight & Fiscal Stewardship

Policy Objective

Prioritize transportation funds for core road repair and maintenance, increase transparency over MDOT spending, and prevent diversion of gas-tax revenues to unrelated projects. The House Fiscal Agency published the MDOT 2021/2022 budget at $3.1 billion. The department's 2025/2026 budget is $7.8 billion. And the roads are still bad.

Background and Structural Context

One major reason the roads are still a mess is that gas-tax money is being spent on airports, harbors, trains, planes, and buses. MDOT spends $35 million on a DNR recreational improvement program, $350 million on debt retirement, and additional funds on a planned Detroit-to-Traverse City Amtrak luxury train that is unlikely to ever pay for itself.

Policy Components

  1. Funding Prioritization: Direct transportation revenue toward roads and essential infrastructure. Limit the use of gas tax revenues for projects not directly related to road operations.
  2. Transparency and Reporting: Require detailed reporting of MDOT expenditures, debt service, and project-level performance metrics. Require MDOT to enforce contracts to repair roads, not receive new bids.
  3. Citizens Advisory Council: Establish a Governor-appointed citizen advisory council to meet regularly and review MDOT priorities, suggest efficiencies, and monitor expenditures. Ralph Rebandt plans to personally meet with this council and invites Michigan residents to apply.

XIII. Implementation Mechanics & Legislative Strategy

Drafting Priorities and Bill Packages

Prepare draft amendments to put before the Michigan House and Michigan Senate for the Michigan Administrative Procedures Act, FOIA expansion, MPSC appointment and term changes, NDA prohibition, voter verification statutes, and Urban Cooperation Act revisions. Each draft should include transitional provisions to preserve continuity of regulated services and election administration. Technical appendices should provide model statutory language, define effective dates, and propose conforming changes to related statutes.

Stakeholder Engagement

Convene working groups of local clerks, county administrators, municipal associations (Michigan Municipal League, Michigan Townships Association), utility regulators, consumer advocates, and technical experts to vet drafting details and identify operational bottlenecks. Allocate implementation funding for the Auditor General, JCAR, and county clerks to build technical capacity for audits, reviews, and compliance monitoring.

Communications and Public Framing

Frame the reforms as restoring accountability and local control, protecting taxpayers, and ensuring reliable services. Provide clear explanation of transitional protections for schools, public safety, and local services in the property tax transition package. Prepare white papers, one-page legislative briefs, and public Q&A documents tailored for committee members, media, and civic groups.

Enforcement, Oversight, and Evaluation

Empower the Auditor General and Attorney General with investigatory and enforcement tools to monitor compliance with FOIA, rulemaking requirements, NDA prohibitions, and utility transparency rules. Establish reporting metrics and periodic public reports on progress, including state audits at defined intervals during major transitions such as property tax elimination.

Conclusion

This Governing Blueprint sets forth a complete, operational plan for the policy positions that the Rebandt campaign holds. Politicians over the past 25 years have offered short-term fixes. What is needed — and what this document provides — is the insight and determination to research and dig in to find the actual problem, and then fix it.

Each section translates policy ideas into statutory and administrative actions, assigns responsibilities, and identifies funding, staffing, and oversight needs required to implement the reforms without disrupting essential public services. The package is designed to be immediately actionable by legislative drafters and transition staff.

Join us and help fix Michigan.

Read more, get involved.

Explore Ralph Rebandt's Platform & Issues, view upcoming campaign events, or contact the campaign directly.

Platform & Issues Upcoming Events Donate